Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000, Louis Proyect wrote:
> Owen:
> >The position of the SWP on the domestic class struggle
> >is that if there is a picket or a protest of some form which is not led by
> >some far-Right organisation, then the revolution is a few steps closer (in
> >proportion to the size of the protest).
>
> Citation, please.
>
"It is increasingly obvious that even one major national strike or an
all-out strike in one city would lead to a rapid crisis of Blairism and
Labourism as society polarised along class lines"
(International Socialism No82, spring 1999, p35)
- Thread context:
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?, (continued)
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
Russell Grinker Sun 17 Sep 2000, 08:29 GMT
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
Owen Jones Sun 17 Sep 2000, 12:07 GMT
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
Owen Jones Sun 17 Sep 2000, 12:08 GMT
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
Louis Proyect Sun 17 Sep 2000, 12:31 GMT
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
David Welch Sun 17 Sep 2000, 13:02 GMT
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
Louis Proyect Sun 17 Sep 2000, 13:38 GMT
- Re: Reactionary petty-bourgeois strikes?,
David Welch Sun 17 Sep 2000, 14:47 GMT
- Subscription options reminder,
Louis Proyect Fri 15 Sep 2000, 13:27 GMT
- From the ABC,
Alan Bradley Fri 15 Sep 2000, 09:44 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]