Re: The issue isn't socialism, it's opposing racist lies used to sell

[Borba100@xxxxxxxxxxx]

In a message dated 09/11/2000 9:09:39 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
L.WILLMS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

<<  with the famous rally on Kosovo Polje and the
 abolishment of the autonomy of Kosovo and Vojvodina which even more
 sharpened the falling out of the diverging burocratic cliques and
 which set the tone for the conflicts in Kosovo. >>

First, regarding Milsoevich's speech at Kosovo Polje; it is discussed often,
rarely accurately.  It was made famous without a translation ever being
presented to the Western public.  We got one from a US government agency that
translates foreign government documents.  Here is the text, included in the
following from Emperor's Clothes:

URL is http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/milosaid.html

Milosevic's Speech at Kosovo Field in 1989

It is impossible for a society to engage in genocide unless the population is
won to racism because racism is not inborn, not natural. For racism to take
root, the culture and the political leadership have to support racism in
deeds -- and also in words.

We are told this has happened in Serbia. We are told that Slobodan Milosevich
and other Serbian leaders have indoctrinated the Serbian people in hatred for
non-Serbs, especially ethnic Albanians in Kosovo province. We are told that
Milosevich launched this racist campaign in a speech at Kosovo Field in 1989.

The charge against Milosevich - that he preaches race hate - is significant
because it supports the charge against the Serbian people - that they have
been won to racism and therefore practice genocide. Because many Americans
believe these charges they are disposed to believe there must be some truth
to the avalanche of pro-war propaganda demonizing the Serbs.

So. It is important to know exactly what Milosevich said in his speech at
Kosovo Field. Yet nowhere do any of those who attack Milosevich's speech
quote his words. Why not?

Greg Elich, a political analyst/investigator, has unearthed a U.S. government
transcript of the Kosovo Field speech. Please read it and ask: is it a racist
diatribe, reminiscent of Hitler? Or is it something quite different,
something really quite different indeed?

* * * * * * *

[Speech by Slobodan Milosevich, delivered to 1 million people at the central
celebration marking the 600th anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo, held at
Gazimestan on 28 June, 1989]

Compiled by the National Technical Information Service of the Department of
Commerce of the U.S.

By the force of social circumstances this great 600th anniversary of the
Battle of Kosovo is taking place in a year in which Serbia, after many years,
after many decades, has regained its state, national, and spiritual
integrity. Therefore, it is not difficult for us to answer today the old
question: how are we going to face Milos [Milos Obilic, legendary hero of the
Battle of Kosovo]. Through the play of history and life, it seems as if
Serbia has, precisely in this year, in 1989, regained its state and its
dignity and thus has celebrated an event of the distant past which has a
great historical and symbolic significance for its future.

Serbian Character -- Liberational

Today, it is difficult to say what is the historical truth about the Battle
of Kosovo and what is legend. Today this is no longer important. Oppressed by
pain and filled with hope, the people used to remember and to forget, as,
after all, all people in the world do, and it was ashamed of treachery and
glorified heroism. Therefore it is difficult to say today whether the Battle
of Kosovo was a defeat or a victory for the Serbian people, whether thanks to
it we fell into slavery or we survived in this slavery. The answers to those
questions will be constantly sought by science and the people. What has been
certain through all the centuries until our time today is that disharmony
struck Kosovo 600 years ago. If we lost the battle, then this was not only
the result of social superiority and the armed advantage of the Ottoman
Empire but also of the tragic disunity in the leadership of the Serbian state
at that time. In that distant 1389, the Ottoman Empire was not only stronger
than that of the Serbs but it was also more fortunate than the Serbian
kingdom.

The lack of unity and betrayal in Kosovo will continue to follow the Serbian
people like an evil fate through the whole of its history. Even in the last
war, this lack of unity and betrayal led the Serbian people and Serbia into
agony, the consequences of which in the historical and moral sense exceeded
fascist aggression.

Even later, when a socialist Yugoslavia was set up, in this new state the
Serbian leadership remained divided, prone to compromise to the detriment of
its own people. The concessions that many Serbian leaders made at the expense
of their people could not be accepted historically and ethically by any
nation in the world, especially because the Serbs have never in the whole of
their history conquered and exploited others. Their national and historical
being has been liberational throughout the whole of history and through two
world wars, as it is today. They liberated themselves and when they could
they also helped others to liberate themselves. The fact that in this region
they are a major nation is not a Serbian sin or shame; this is an advantage
which they have not used against others, but I must say that here, in this
big, legendary field of Kosovo, the Serbs have not used the advantage of
being great for their own benefit either.

Thanks to their leaders and politicians and their vassal mentality they felt
guilty before themselves and others. This situation lasted for decades, it
lasted for years and here we are now at the field of Kosovo to say that this
is no longer the case.

Unity Will Make Prosperity Possible

Disunity among Serb officials made Serbia lag behind and their inferiority
humiliated Serbia. Therefore, no place in Serbia is better suited for saying
this than the field of Kosovo and no place in Serbia is better suited than
the field of Kosovo for saying that unity in Serbia will bring prosperity to
the Serbian people in Serbia and each one of its citizens, irrespective of
his national or religious affiliation.

Serbia of today is united and equal to other republics and prepared to do
everything to improve its financial and social position and that of all its
citizens. If there is unity, cooperation, and seriousness, it will succeed in
doing so. This is why the optimism that is now present in Serbia to a
considerable extent regarding the future days is realistic, also because it
is based on freedom, which makes it possible for all people to express their
positive, creative and humane abilities aimed at furthering social and
personal life.

Serbia has never had only Serbs living in it. Today, more than in the past,
members of other peoples and nationalities also live in it. This is not a
disadvantage for Serbia. I am truly convinced that it is its advantage.
National composition of almost all countries in the world today, particularly
developed ones, has also been changing in this direction. Citizens of
different nationalities, religions, and races have been living together more
and more frequently and more and more successfully.

Socialism in particular, being a progressive and just democratic society,
should not allow people to be divided in the national and religious respect.
The only differences one can and should allow in socialism are between hard
working people and idlers and between honest people and dishonest people.
Therefore, all people in Serbia who live from their own work, honestly,
respecting other people and other nations, are in their own republic.

Dramatic National Divisions

After all, our entire country should be set up on the basis of such
principles. Yugoslavia is a multinational community and it can survive only
under the conditions of full equality for all nations that live in it.

The crisis that hit Yugoslavia has brought about national divisions, but also
social, cultural, religious and many other less important ones. Among all
these divisions, nationalist ones have shown themselves to be the most
dramatic. Resolving them will make it easier to remove other divisions and
mitigate the consequences they have created.

For as long as multinational communities have existed, their weak point has
always been the relations between different nations. The threat is that the
question of one nation being endangered by the others can be posed one day --
and this can then start a wave of suspicions, accusations, and intolerance, a
wave that invariably grows and is difficult to stop. This threat has been
hanging like a sword over our heads all the time. Internal and external
enemies of multi-national communities are aware of this and therefore they
organize their activity against multinational societies mostly by fomenting
national conflicts. At this moment, we in Yugoslavia are behaving as if we
have never had such an experience and as if in our recent and distant past we
have never experienced the worst tragedy of national conflicts that a society
can experience and still survive.

Equal and harmonious relations among Yugoslav peoples are a necessary
condition for the existence of Yugoslavia and for it to find its way out of
the crisis and, in particular, they are a necessary condition for its
economic and social prosperity. In this respect Yugoslavia does not stand out
from the social milieu of the contemporary, particularly the developed,
world. This world is more and more marked by national tolerance, national
cooperation, and even national equality. The modern economic and
technological, as well as political and cultural development, has guided
various peoples toward each other, has made them interdependent and
increasingly has made them equal as well [medjusobno ravnopravni]. Equal and
united
people can above all become a part of the civilization toward which mankind
is moving. If we cannot be at the head of the column leading to such a
civilization, there is certainly no need for us to be at is tail.

At the time when this famous historical battle was fought in Kosovo, the
people were looking at the stars, expecting aid from them. Now, 6 centuries
later, they are looking at the stars again, waiting to conquer them. On the
first occasion, they could allow themselves to be disunited and to have
hatred and treason because they lived in smaller, weakly interlinked worlds.
Now, as people on this planet, they cannot conquer even their own planet if
they are not united, let alone other planets, unless they live in mutual
harmony and solidarity.

Therefore, words devoted to unity, solidarity, and cooperation among people
have no greater significance anywhere on the soil of our motherland than they
have here in the field of Kosovo, which is a symbol of disunity and treason.

In the memory of the Serbian people, this disunity was decisive in causing
the loss of the battle and in bringing about the fate which Serbia suffered
for a full 6 centuries.

Even if it were not so, from a historical point of view, it remains certain
that the people regarded disunity as its greatest disaster. Therefore it is
the obligation of the people to remove disunity, so that they may protect
themselves from defeats, failures, and stagnation in the future.

Unity brings Back Dignity

This year, the Serbian people became aware of the necessity of their mutual
harmony as the indispensable condition for their present life and further
development.

I am convinced that this awareness of harmony and unity will make it possible
for Serbia not only to function as a state but to function as a successful
state. Therefore I think that it makes sense to say this here in Kosovo,
where that disunity once upon a time tragically pushed back Serbia for
centuries and endangered it, and where renewed unity may advance it and may
return dignity to it. Such an awareness about mutual relations constitutes an
elementary necessity for Yugoslavia, too, for its fate is in the joined hands
of all its peoples. The Kosovo heroism has been inspiring our creativity for
6 centuries, and has been feeding our pride and does not allow us to forget
that at one time we were an army great, brave, and proud, one of the few that
remained undefeated when losing.

Six centuries later, now, we are being again engaged in battles and are
facing battles. They are not armed battles, although such things cannot be
excluded yet. However, regardless of what kind of battles they are, they
cannot be won without resolve, bravery, and sacrifice, without the noble
qualities that were present here in the field of Kosovo in the days past. Our
chief battle now concerns implementing the economic, political, cultural, and
general social prosperity, finding a quicker and more successful approach to
a civilization in which people will live in the 21st century. For this
battle, we certainly need heroism, of course of a somewhat different kind,
but that courage without which nothing serious and great can be achieved
remains unchanged and remains urgently necessary.

Six centuries ago, Serbia heroically defended itself in the field of Kosovo,
but it also defended Europe. Serbia was at that time the bastion that
defended the European culture, religion, and European society in general.
Therefore today it appears not only unjust but even unhistorical and
completely absurd to talk about Serbia's belonging to Europe. Serbia has been
a part of Europe incessantly, now just as much as it was in the past, of
course, in its own way, but in a way that in the historical sense never
deprived it of dignity. In this spirit we now endeavor to build a society,
rich and democratic, and thus to contribute to the prosperity of this
beautiful country, this unjustly suffering country, but also to contribute to
the efforts of all the progressive people of our age that they make for a
better and happier world.

Let the memory of Kosovo heroism live forever!

Long live Serbia!

Long live Yugoslavia!

Long live peace and brotherhood among peoples!

* * * * * * * *

Historical note:
This speech came at the culmination of a struggle in which millions of Serbs,
Gypsies, Hungarians, Jews, Turks and other ethnic groups opposed the racist
policies of the secessionist movement among Kosovo Albanians. For years the
fascistic secessionists had dominated Kosovo; their persecution of other
ethnic groups, especially Serbs and Romas ("Gypsies") is well documented; so
is the multi-ethnic character of the
mass movement against that persecution.

What is so amazing about Milosevich's speech is he does not use the occasion
of addressing a MILLION people in Kosovo to advance a narrow ethnic agenda.
He does not at any point attack ethnic Albanians. Instead he calls for
reconciliation and mutual respect, citing the presence of different ethnic
groups as Serbia's strength. Of course the speech does celebrate the
existence of Serbia as a nation. But don't ALL national leaders celebrate the
existence of their nations? The important point is he celebrates it as a
multi-ethnic entity and that he never calls for attacks on non-Serbian
territory. Indeed, his point about the Kosovo Field battle of 1389 is that
the Serbian army was morally superior and therefore victorious even in
defeat, a rather sophisticated if melancholy viewpoint definitely over the
head of the one-time Rhodes Scholar who is now Hustler-in-Chief of our own
poor (though all-powerful) country.

P.S. Below is a letter I just sent the Independent, a British paper:

Dear editor:

In his May 3 letter Stuart Russell presents NATO's claims of massive Serbian
atrocities as proven and asserts government complicity because "We have yet
to hear any mention of Milosevich condemning, or even distancing himself from
the atrocities."

Milosevich told UPI on April 30th:

"We are not angels. Nor are we the devils you have made us out to be. Our
regular forces are highly disciplined. The paramilitary irregular forces are
a different story. Bad things happened... We have arrested those irregular
self-appointed leaders. Some have already been tried and sentenced to 20
years in prison."
Proving innocence is harder than charging guilt. But consider: NATO and the
media have been exposed over 50 times lying and fabricating evidence (E.g.,
Jamie Rubin said on 3/30 that Pristina Stadium was being used to intern tens
of thousands; but when Agence France Presse reported the stadium had been
unused in weeks, Rubin simply denied having made the charge; NATO presented a
tape of a pilot bombing a refugee caravan only later to explain it was AN
EXAMPLE of such a tape (?!), Agence France Presse reported (4/24) an
Amsterdam reconnaissance expert's finding that NATO had doctored "mass grave"
pictures, etc., etc.) If the prosecution is caught systematically lying and
creating evidence, shouldn't it be the one on trial?

Jared Israel

***

If you're reading this article in a site other than Emperors-Clothes.com and
would like to see more, please click here

If you find emperors-clothes.com useful, we can use your help...

All our expenses are covered by individual donations. Right now we are behind
on phone bills (we use the phone for interviews and editorial meetings) and
for Lexis, the wonderful Internet tool that we use to research articles. Any
donation will help with these expenses and for special projects like
'JUDGMENT', the new film we just produced.

To use our secure server, please click here or go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/howyour.htm.

Or mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 610-321, Newton, MA
02461-0321. Thanks.

To browse articles from Emperors-Clothes.com, go to
http://www.emperors-clothes.com and scroll down the page

www.tenc.net [emperors-clothes]