Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Analysis of the U.S. Greens
- Subject: Re: Analysis of the U.S. Greens
- From: "Macdonald Stainsby" <mstainsby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2000 02:26:44 -0700
>
> > I asked Resenbrink for his assessment of the political record of the
German
> > Greens, particularly their role as partners in the ruling coalition
headed
> > by the Social Democrats, which has slashed social spending and taxes on
big
> > business, and participated in NATO's war against Yugoslavia.
>
> This is bullshit. The Greens were pretty vocal in their criticism of
> the war, but make up only 7% of the parliament;
*clip*
That is totally irrelevant. The Green Party had a leader, Fischer, who
banned discussion about the war, declaring it a "moral imperative" or
something almost exactly the same. Once the party did not call an emergency
no-confidence vote in Joshka (or whatever form that would take in their
party program/constitution), they lost all respectability and became
accomplises to Imperialism. There might be a lot of things a struggling left
party may be excused for while fighting inside a bourgeois parliament, but
Imperialist war against sovereign states is never, in any circumstances,
something included in that. Nothing else could provide a clearer dividing
line.
Macdonald
- Thread context:
- [Fwd: JN: Berenson case and US government responsibility],
Juan R. Fajardo Sat 02 Sep 2000, 17:39 GMT
- Dark Days,
Louis Proyect Sat 02 Sep 2000, 14:06 GMT
- Analysis of the U.S. Greens,
Jay Moore Sat 02 Sep 2000, 14:04 GMT
- Comments on "idleness" at work from PEN-L,
Louis Proyect Sat 02 Sep 2000, 12:23 GMT
- Milosevich the nationalist? hardly,
Borba100 Sat 02 Sep 2000, 05:28 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]