Re: Forwarded from Anthony (on Peron)

["red-rebel" <red-rebel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I can confidently confirm that despite Mark's somewhat paranoid suspicions,
myself and Jim Hillier are in no way related. It's usually surnames that
indicate familial connections not first names!

James.

P.S Mark, I note the little remark about "your own Party being able to hold
its congress in a phone booth", presumably refferring to the Socialist
Labour Party (of which both myself and Jim Hilier are members). However, I
do not believe it is either fair or accurate (not to mention realistic) to
judge the S.L.P by the rather emabarrasing lack of success in your own
attempts at Party buliding (Where now the glorious Communist
Party-Refoundation?). Or do and your good-pal Ken have a cunning plan? (It
wouldn't happen to be called " re-joining The Labour Party", would it?)


----- Original Message -----
From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Forwarded from Anthony (on Peron)


> >This is WAY too simplistic. Modern (post-war), European fascism has been
a
> >very much working-class affair. For example, in the UK the BNP are
getting
> >nearly ALL their support in working-class areas. e.g coming second to
Labour
> >with 27% in a council election in Bexleyheath, east London last week. It
is,
> >sad to say, the Left that has become a "movement of the
petty-bourgoisie".
> >
> >James Tait
>
> Is James Tait our own James Hillier? Maybe I'll start using my party name
> from SWP days: Mendel Berkowitz-Garcia.
>
> Louis Proyect
> Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org/