Re: Land, Bread and Sex!

["Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky" <Gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

En relación a Re: Land, Bread and Sex!,
el 13 Jul 00, a las 14:40, Johannes Schneider dijo:

> Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky wrote:
>
> > Excuse me, but there is some flaw here: were the German bourgeois a
> > "weaker and less-established" bourgeoisie in the 30s?
>
> It certainly was for the following reason:
>
> - strength of the German labour movement (before 33)
> - lost WW I
> - no successful bourgeois revolution
>
> Johannes
>

I was specifically comparing with France. And as to the bourgeois
revolution in Germany, if you mean a "classical" bourgeois revolution
with all the features that describe, say, the Third French Republic,
its absence was IMHO more a reason to consider German bourgeoisie a
strong one and not a weak one.

But having lost WWI, and the existence of a militant working class
are good points on your side!

Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxx
NUEVA DIRECCIÓN ELECTRÓNICA DESDE EL 10 DE JULIO DE 2000
NEW E-ADDRESS AS OF JULY 10, 2000
gorojovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx