Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Art and Left Politics
- Subject: Art and Left Politics
- From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 11:49:01 -0700
I want to raise as a hypothesis at least worth exploring that the
political effect of a movie, a poem, a painting, a commerical, a musical
performance depends *not* on the content or style of the work but on the
political context in which it is received. That in periods of great
leftist political activity even the most reactionary art will be
interpreted by large sectors of the audience in progressive terms and
have a progressive impact, while in periods of relative quiescence of
the working class and progressive political activity even the most
progressive/revolutionary art will be perceived as conservative and will
tend to have a conservative influence. Within what sort of a framework
did the bulk of the audience that saw The Matrix perceive that film?
Just a thought.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- Bush disrupted at NAACP convention,
Greg Butterfield Mon 10 Jul 2000, 21:24 GMT
- Protesters Disrupt Bush Appearance at N.A.A.C.P. Convention (NY Times),
Brklyn Bombshell Mon 10 Jul 2000, 20:26 GMT
- Re: Fite Klub Sucks etc.,
George Windau Mon 10 Jul 2000, 20:18 GMT
- Re: Marxism and science fiction,
Einde O'Callaghan Mon 10 Jul 2000, 19:49 GMT
- Art and Left Politics,
Carrol Cox Mon 10 Jul 2000, 18:49 GMT
- FW: [energyresources] Michael J. Economides and Ronald E. Oligney the authors of Color of Oil,
Mark Jones Mon 10 Jul 2000, 18:34 GMT
- Re: Fwd: Neo-Nazis Bore From Within the Buchanan Campaign,
Louis Proyect Mon 10 Jul 2000, 18:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]