Re: Red Ken outrage

["Chris Kromm" <ckromm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Livinstone = Gulliani and Wilson? Seperately or combined?

I never did take you seriously, but it's even harder now.

----- Original Message -----
From: red-rebel <red-rebel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: Red Ken outrage


> But the whole point of the "carping" is that Ken Livingstone is no more a
> "Red" than Rudolph Gulliani or Pete Wilson.
>  If you support Ken, you support capitalism and imperialism, just as he
> does.
> A Capitalist is a Capitalist. (And from what I hear about Kens stocks &
> shares fortune, he's as big a capitalist as any!)
>
> James Tait.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: M A Jones <jones118@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Red Ken outrage
>
>
> > Chris Kromm wrote:
> >
> > > You Brits have no idea how funny you sound arguing about whether Red
Ken
> > is
> > > a sellout. What would we give to have anything even resembling a "red"
> > mayor
> > > in ANY U.S. city!
> >
> > Well, that's just my argument against the backbiters and carpers. I
> support
> > Ken.
> >
> > Carpe diem.
> >
> > Mark Jones
> > http://www.egroups.com/group/CrashList
> >
> >
>