Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Red Ken outrage
But the whole point of the "carping" is that Ken Livingstone is no more a
"Red" than Rudolph Gulliani or Pete Wilson.
If you support Ken, you support capitalism and imperialism, just as he
does.
A Capitalist is a Capitalist. (And from what I hear about Kens stocks &
shares fortune, he's as big a capitalist as any!)
James Tait.
----- Original Message -----
From: M A Jones <jones118@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2000 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Red Ken outrage
> Chris Kromm wrote:
>
> > You Brits have no idea how funny you sound arguing about whether Red Ken
> is
> > a sellout. What would we give to have anything even resembling a "red"
> mayor
> > in ANY U.S. city!
>
> Well, that's just my argument against the backbiters and carpers. I
support
> Ken.
>
> Carpe diem.
>
> Mark Jones
> http://www.egroups.com/group/CrashList
>
>
- Thread context:
- Re: Red Ken outrage, (continued)
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
Russell Grinker Thu 11 May 2000, 12:29 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
M A Jones Fri 12 May 2000, 07:26 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
Chris Kromm Fri 12 May 2000, 13:57 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
M A Jones Fri 12 May 2000, 16:42 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
red-rebel Fri 12 May 2000, 19:05 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
Chris Kromm Fri 12 May 2000, 21:00 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
Einde O'Callaghan Fri 12 May 2000, 22:06 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
Peter Reardon Fri 12 May 2000, 22:19 GMT
- Re: Red Ken outrage,
Louis Proyect Fri 12 May 2000, 22:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]