Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Do sweatshops "free" women? (PEN-L exchange)
- Subject: Re: Do sweatshops "free" women? (PEN-L exchange)
- From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 08:49:51 -0700
jonathan flanders wrote:
> "Do sweatshops "free" women? (PEN-L exchange)"
>
> No, they just change the conditions of enslavement from rural semi-feudal
> patriarchy to capitalist wage slavery.
>
> Women workers in factories will free themselve through struggle. If they
> can't, let's junk Marxism and look for something else.
This seems right to me -- except, perhaps, that it tends to support the
opposing view. Sweatshops do not free women, but they establish
conditions (in *contrast* to "rural semi-feudal patriarchy") in which
women *can* struggle to free themselves. I have no real opinion
on the conflict -- but as far as I know, no one has ever really claimed
that sweatshops free women, only that the unfreedom there can (unlike
the unfreedom of poverty-stricken rural patriarchy) be struggled
against.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- An IPO for marxmail.org?,
Louis Proyect Tue 09 May 2000, 14:54 GMT
- Negativland,
Louis Proyect Tue 09 May 2000, 14:52 GMT
- Do sweatshops "free" women? (PEN-L exchange),
Louis Proyect Tue 09 May 2000, 14:01 GMT
- Re: Muzsikás and Bela Bartok,
Louis Proyect Tue 09 May 2000, 13:15 GMT
- "Lenin might yet have the last laugh",
Louis Proyect Tue 09 May 2000, 13:04 GMT
- What's in the latest Green Left Weekly? #404 May 10, 2000,
Green Left Parramatta Tue 09 May 2000, 07:47 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]