Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Keynes and Marx
>>> Carlos Eduardo Rebello <crebello@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 02/10/0
Keynes's theory, in fact, is a theory of capitalist accumulation from
the point of view of *the actual actions of the bourgeoisie as a
collection of individuals*, something that was lacking, in my view, in
Marx, that still centered on the analysis of the process of production
as such and set to analyze the organization of capitalist production as
a whole mainly as from the abstract viewpoint of a counterfactual
"proportionate" capitalist economy that does not exist, of course, but
that he followers, less diatecticians than him, thought exist, something
with spwned a whole ill-guided controversy about the Bk.2 reproduction
schemes from which little useful can be rescued.
&&&&&&&&&&
CB: Carlos, could you elaborate a little on what you mean by "the abstract
viewpoint
of a counterfactual 'proportionate' capitalist economy that does not exist " ?
CB
- Thread context:
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Philip L Ferguson Wed 09 Feb 2000, 03:38 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Gary MacLennan Wed 09 Feb 2000, 05:42 GMT
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Thu 10 Feb 2000, 03:38 GMT
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Carlos Eduardo Rebello Thu 10 Feb 2000, 14:49 GMT
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Charles Brown Thu 10 Feb 2000, 18:14 GMT
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Carlos Eduardo Rebello Fri 11 Feb 2000, 01:26 GMT
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Louis Proyect Fri 11 Feb 2000, 02:11 GMT
- Re: Keynes and Marx,
Michael Yates Fri 11 Feb 2000, 02:40 GMT
- Demystifying U.S. foreign policy,
Ulhas Joglekar Wed 09 Feb 2000, 03:20 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]