Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Bad writing
Paul Flewers <paul.flewers@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
<snip>
>
> Actually, Orwell is not the best example for clear writing. To be
sure,
> he had a very good writing style, but when one considers that his last
> two novels, Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four, were and continue to
> be used as Cold War propaganda, something went severely wrong. He
> complained about their misuse, but if to have one novel misinterpreted
> looks like misfortune, to have two misinterpreted in exactly the same
> way looks like carelessness.
>
<snip>
I have to echo these sentiments here, and also echo someone that bears
repeating. Michael Parenti, even if one has a partcular "polemic" with
this or that that he said, is tremendously layman accessible. Anytime I
begin to talk socialism with a newcomer, I immediately refer them. Very
seldom does it not get the reader a clearer understanding, often MP
becomes a new favorite of said individual.
--
Macdonald Stainsby
check the "ten point platform" of Tao at: http://new.tao.ca
"To give food aid to a country just because they are starving is a
pretty weak reason."
Henry Kissinger, 1974
(former American Secretary of State)
- Thread context:
- Fwd: WTO : Monday in Seattle,
Macdonald Stainsby Sun 05 Dec 1999, 00:57 GMT
- Re: Abomination of Desolation [put in a place where it shouldn't be].,
Louis Proyect Sun 05 Dec 1999, 00:49 GMT
- Bad writing,
Louis Proyect Sat 04 Dec 1999, 22:28 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Bad writing,
Macdonald Stainsby Sun 05 Dec 1999, 21:21 GMT
- Re: Bad writing,
Michael Pugliese Sun 05 Dec 1999, 21:33 GMT
- Re: Bad writing,
Doyle Saylor Sun 05 Dec 1999, 22:35 GMT
- Re: Bad writing,
Paul Flewers Mon 06 Dec 1999, 04:33 GMT
- Re: Bad writing,
Doyle Saylor Mon 06 Dec 1999, 05:51 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]