Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School
- Subject: Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School
- From: Paul Flewers <paul.flewers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 1999 23:03:36 -0800
Dennis R Redmond wrote: < Why do you consider postmodernism and
deconstruction to be a sham? >
At the first class of an MA course I did a couple of years ago, the
tutor said 'We will be deconstructing the history of...' I said 'What do
you mean by "deconstructing" it?' He replied 'Analysing it.' I was too
polite to say 'Well why not use that word in the first place?'
I get suspicious of people who use flashy words and phrases, when there
are perfectly good ones which we can all understand. I'm sure a lot of
people in the humanities use convoluted phrases merely because long
words can make banal ideas look impressive.
Paul F
- Thread context:
- Fw: From_telos-forum: Telos Newsletter,
Michael Pugliese Wed 03 Nov 1999, 11:55 GMT
- Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School,
Michael Pugliese Wed 03 Nov 1999, 11:45 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School,
Dennis R Redmond Wed 03 Nov 1999, 21:54 GMT
- Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School,
Macdonald Stainsby Thu 04 Nov 1999, 06:31 GMT
- Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School,
Paul Flewers Thu 04 Nov 1999, 07:03 GMT
- Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School,
Dennis R Redmond Thu 04 Nov 1999, 10:12 GMT
- Re: Stratfor plus sources on paleo-cons and the Frankfurt School,
Michael Pugliese Thu 04 Nov 1999, 15:54 GMT
- Fwd: United States/Vietnam,
Macdonald Stainsby Wed 03 Nov 1999, 08:01 GMT
- Friedman vs. Ramonet,
Michael Pugliese Wed 03 Nov 1999, 07:35 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]