Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology
- Subject: Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology
- From: bernie wool <bernard.wool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:15:38 +0100
It's worth also remembering that scientists versed in 'dialectical materialism.
included Lysencko and Beloussov, who respectively engineered the almost compete
disappearence of genetics in the Soviet Union and contributed to the failure of
collective agriculture and mass starvation, and set back Soviet Earth Sciences
by
many decades because of a similar proscription of ideas of a dynamic planet
continually in change. The former SU and Eastern bloc countries became
ecological
wastelands through the willful failure to accept ideas in ecology.
I think that Charles has things the wrong way around in "Who says dialectical
materialism hasn't produced results in natural science ?". Philosophy
abstracts at a
general level from the empirical advance of knowledge of the world and people.
It
may be predictive in a general way, but the fact that, for instance,
confirmation by
experiment of Einstein's relativity helped contribute to the development of
Marxism
(well, it should have done, but we see very little discussion of that among
Marxists)
does not prove the opposite. Einstein was not a Marxist, and the same goes for
virtually every scientist. This is not surprising, for the same process of
alienation goes on in science and technology as it does throughout a society
dominated by capital. The problem, as I see it, is not a failure to deploy
'dialectical materialism' in science, but that science is chained and distorted
by
capital..
BW
Charles Brown wrote:
> >>> Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx> 10/19/99 09:17PM >>>
> 1) John Bellamy Foster replying to Michael Perelman's query whether ecology
> existed prior to the 1850's:
>
> >From the standpoint of today the three greatest ecological
> discoveries all came from the Marxist theorists and Soviet scientists: the
> idea of the biosphere, the discovery of the original centers of agriculture
> and the sources of germplasm, and the theory of the origins of life. It was
> the Oparin/Haldane theory of the origin of life that provided the foundation
> for Rachel Carson's most comprehensive ecological statement.
>
> (((((((((((
>
> CB: Who says dialectical materialism hasn't produced results in natural
> science ?
>
> CB
- Thread context:
- Fwd: China,
Macdonald Stainsby Wed 20 Oct 1999, 08:12 GMT
- CARTA ABIERTA DEL SUR AL BANCO MUNDIAL/AN OPEN LETTER FROM THE SOUTHTO THE WORLD BANK,
KDean75206 Wed 20 Oct 1999, 01:38 GMT
- Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
Louis Proyect Wed 20 Oct 1999, 01:17 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
Charles Brown Wed 20 Oct 1999, 16:54 GMT
- Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
bernie wool Wed 20 Oct 1999, 21:15 GMT
- Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
Charles Brown Thu 21 Oct 1999, 13:26 GMT
- Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
Brian Basgen Thu 21 Oct 1999, 14:35 GMT
- Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
Carrol Cox Thu 21 Oct 1999, 15:09 GMT
- Re: Exchanges on Marxism and ecology,
Sven Buttler Thu 21 Oct 1999, 15:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]