Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?
- Subject: Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?
- From: Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 13:10:44 -0500
Louis Proyect wrote:
> Carrol, you really haven't understood the debate.
No Lou, you really haven't understood that several different debates
are interwined. As I have said at least twice, our fundamental
disagreement concerns what we disagree over. I have not entered
the empirical debate over the 16th century and do not intend to.
I seriously suspect that you are pulling our leg. You have again
tried to equate Brenner and Cohen by some form of free association,
while you must know that Brenner and Cohen are as sharply
opposed as it is possible for two self-labelled marxists to be.
Carrol
- Thread context:
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?, (continued)
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
TAHIR WOOD Tue 12 Oct 1999, 15:17 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Oct 1999, 15:48 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Carrol Cox Tue 12 Oct 1999, 16:57 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Oct 1999, 17:29 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Carrol Cox Tue 12 Oct 1999, 18:10 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Oct 1999, 19:47 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
James Farmelant Tue 12 Oct 1999, 20:52 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Charles Brown Tue 12 Oct 1999, 22:22 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
James Farmelant Wed 13 Oct 1999, 00:18 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]