Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Were sugar plantations capitalist?
- Subject: Were sugar plantations capitalist?
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:22:50 -0400
>If you want to defend empiricism against marxism, I will debate you
>on that.
>Carrol
Okay, I'd be happy to defend empiricism against marxism. You go first. But
I warn you, my reply will be rapier-like and unstinting. You have never
heard my "when trees fall in the woods, but they land on the head of a
bear--who is taking a shit at the time" philosophical exposition, have you?
It is my ace in the sleeve. You are doomed.
Louis Proyect
(The Marxism mailing list: http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)
- Thread context:
- Re: Blindness, foolishness, or what?,
Nestor Miguel Gorojovsky Mon 11 Oct 1999, 22:37 GMT
- Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Mon 11 Oct 1999, 22:20 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Carlos Eduardo Rebello Tue 12 Oct 1999, 06:10 GMT
- Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Oct 1999, 13:22 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
TAHIR WOOD Tue 12 Oct 1999, 15:17 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Oct 1999, 15:48 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Carrol Cox Tue 12 Oct 1999, 16:57 GMT
- Re: Were sugar plantations capitalist?,
Louis Proyect Tue 12 Oct 1999, 17:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]