Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: labor party
- Subject: Re: labor party
- From: dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx (Doug Henwood)
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 11:44:14 -0500
At 8:58 PM 7/23/96, James F. Miller wrote:
>I argued that if any of the radicals in the "labor
>party" tried to make something of the party other than
>what the bureaucrats wanted, the union officials would
>just chuck them out, because the party belongs to the
>union officials.
For what it's worth, Labor Party loyalists say the reason the Buffalo
chapter's charter was rescinded was because it was endorsing candidates for
elective office, a violation of the founding convention's guidelines.
It's odd to see an enthusiastic defender of a party line having a problem
with this.
Doug
--
Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
email: <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html>
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Left in France (Re: Central ...),
Jorn Andersen Wed 24 Jul 1996, 05:26 GMT
- MIM Dolts need Marxism,
neil Wed 24 Jul 1996, 04:35 GMT
- labor party,
James F. Miller Wed 24 Jul 1996, 03:58 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: labor party,
Doug Henwood Wed 24 Jul 1996, 16:44 GMT
- Thanks to Zeynep and Jim,
Kevin Cabral Wed 24 Jul 1996, 02:25 GMT
- Songs to the Future!,
Luis Quispe Wed 24 Jul 1996, 01:52 GMT
- Re: MAOISTS OF THE WORLD RALLY TO THE WORLD MOBILISATION,
hariette spierings Wed 24 Jul 1996, 01:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]