Re: A defense worse than the deed

[Luis Quispe <lquispe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dog Adolfo barks:

> That is how I understand the present challenge.  Now that the Maoist parties
> are going to deal hands on with the case of "Quispe" directly on the ground
> - you will notice that with the pronouncement of Action Socialiste, the
> "Quispe" comedy is now politically finished even in the North American
> Continent, and thus we need not concern the list anymore with these morons -
> I feel that the time has come to set open ground for a positive
> understanding of the history of the working class movement among the serious
> people in this list.

This is a silly claim. Action Socialiste made the stupid mistake of
endorsing the Fujimori's WMC, the next day it was announced by the snitch
Olaechea. Jacques Boudin, an Arce acholite, consulted us in written whether
their decision has been correct, however, we told AS that was up to them
but we'll cut off any relations if they do so since we consider this WMC
a move of the Peruvian intelligence services to split the support
movement. In addition, the Party does not endorse this charicature of
unity. AS is a very tiny trot local splinter group that operates
in Montreal only, it publishes sporaedically in French. It has no influence
whatsoever in the U.S.  All the WMC has gotten here is the
counterintelligence sect called MIM (and this is a business deal not
a political one that will expose shortly.)

According to a new directive (not authorized to make it public yet),
the Party is organizing an international meeting of generated
organizations in a location of Europe. This meeting with
the participation of mpp delegates of at least 6 countries of Europe,
North America, and Australia has been already announced and will take
place in August with the participation of a comrade sent from Peru.

For AS, just like for the Zenovievist MIM, the Senderologist Arce Borja
is the PCP and the London Azcueta-Olaechea, is the successor of
President Gonzalo, let's keep them in dreams!


> I do not think that a debate about the themes proposed by comrade Jim would
> mean that everyone would have to turn into a personal fan of J.V. Stalin.
> No.  The main purpose is to foster a rational and factual appreciation of
> the concrete history of the proletariat, so that on that basis, we can
> advance in the task of reconstituting the morale of the class in view of the
> coming struggles.
>
> There is no question, as comrade Jim has already said of defending
> "Stalinism" since there is no such a thing as "Stalinism" except in the
> minds of people like Rodwell and malecki.
>
> It is a question of defending the proletarian version of history,
> overturning the bourgeois slanders and reversing the ludicrous situation
> that has led to the identification of the Hitler regime with that of the
> proletariat in the Soviet Union, thus in fact embellishing and justifying
> Anglo-American imperialism which is the fascism of today!.
>
> I hope you join me in taking a sanguine view and letting this debate proceed
> and comrade Jim to have his say.  Concerted action on the part of those who
> understand the need to debunk the fallacies of the Trotskyst sects will
> certainly be a good precedent for fruitful collaboration on a seminars list
> as proposed for Marxism 3.
>
> With kind regards
>
> Adolfo
>
  With no regards for the snitch.
  Marcelina.
>
>
>      --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>



     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---