Re: Malecki, more time to reading, not replying please!

[malecki@xxxxxxxxxx (Robert Malecki)]

>At 9:12 AM 7/2/96, Robert Malecki wrote:
>
>>The Americans might have lost their shah. However replacing it with a
>>anti-American pro imperialist Mullah goverment is hardly a great loss. In
>>fact for elementry bougeois rights for women its was certainly a great
>>loss..The shah had a better position on women then the Mullahs..
>
>"Hardly a great loss" to American imperialism? Perhaps the distance to your
>hog commune in Sweden is too great for the news to travel, but the U.S.
>ruling class has been obsessed with Iran for 17 years now. The hate it,
>Malecki. Perhaps you forget when Saddam Hussein was America's great friend
>for making war on Iran.
>
>Doug
>

Hi Doug,

Politics for a change! Obviously you did not read my letter to Zeynep closely.
However,  Just because the Mullahs are anti-American does not make them
anti-imperialist..

malecki




     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---