Re: Quispe's rotten bloc: A sample

[malecki@xxxxxxxxxx (Robert Malecki)]

MIM writes;
>The real question is which is the genuine representative of the revolution in
>Peru, AO or Quispe? The question is why does Quispe fabricate
>documents? The question is why does Quispe set up rotten blocs that the
>PCP never did? Burford is trying to read the tea leaves from the PCP-CC
>of today, but he passes over the question of Quispe's authenticity.

The MIM is trying to give us lessons on rotten blocks. And organisation that
found it very difficult to get on the right side of the barricades in the
Jamal case.
Unfortunately the reason for the Maoist wars is that no one on this list
appears to speak for the PCP Peru.However there are numerous pretenters to
the thone. And one thing that Chris has pointed out here which is very true
is that if you scratch the maoist unity on the surface just about anything
can pop out.

In fact this is a step forward in breaking up false unity and paying lip
service to the events in Peru towards a serious discussion on some very
important issues.

 Burford is trying to ask where the PCP-CC support
>is for the WMC: well this question has been around much longer for the
>PCP-CC to answer publicly and clearly: when did the PCP-CC ever back
>Quispe's approach below? The answer is never. The answer is that AO's
>critics don't hold themselves to the same standards they hold AO to,
>because in reality they have no line at all, just the cops', cyberLiberals'
and
>ultra-Trotskyists' desire to cause havoc in the revolutionary forces.

The above is also lip service. How about some political content. Like how to
build United Front solidarity in defense of the poor and working class in
Latin America including Peru?. How about Calero who is facing deportation?

>
>There are those lobbying the PCP-CC to adopt the policy below. And
>everyone is free to think that the policy below is a good thing of "uniting
all
>the Left" or whatever, but it isn't PCP policy, and hasn't been for more than
>16 years. That is the question--not what the reader wants politically him or
>herself, but what the PCP wants. That is the only way to evaluate this
>question. Quispe claims to represent the PCP faithfully. He must now be
>judged on that claim.

Does the above mean that you support Aldolfos "Red Front" policy?

. 2. Malecki--He was never a supporter of the People's War in Peru.
>He is interested in this issue only to cause havoc in the "Stalinist" bloc.
>Malecki didn't ask MIM for any documents.

No, I do not support the PCP political line because we have some serious
disagreements. However i am prepared to defend the PCP against imperialism.
But also other parties and groups in the workers movement in Peru. The MIM
knows that Trotskyists defend both working class parties and the working
class against imperialism not only in Peru but everywhere.

malecki




     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---