Malecki, more time to reading, not replying please!

[Zeynep Tufekcioglu <zeynept@xxxxxxxx>]

>Hi ,
>
>Been wondering how long you are going to beat around the bush. Hoping that
>you would give us not only reports from Turkey, but some political analisis.
>Your reports were of interest but some of the politics were pretty horrible.
>
>For example your saying that "around the time that Iran and Nicaragua were
>ripped out of the hands of imperialism". In the first place nither Iran or
>Nicaragua has been wripped out of the hands of imperialism. And it makes me
>wonder what actually do you mean by this?

Malecki, ok, I apologised seven million times, I am trying to find time to
provide more political analysis on Turkey. I'm really squeezed for time, and
posting analysis of a country that is terra incognita to foreigners takes
time. I do my best.

Again, fine, my politics may be horrible! I can argue if you bring up
serious disagreements.

But, please, please, please! Don't misquote me that much.

I said:

>Towards the end of the 70s, in a world which
>Imperialism was shaken by the loss of Iran and fall of Nicaragua,..

Attention: "loss" of Iran, and "fall" of Nicaragua. They lost their "Shah"
who was their puppet, and an unstable, unfriendly regime was formed.
Nicaragua "fell", as a revolutionary-democratic government that was
anti-imperialist in intent and nature was formed.

English is not my mother tongue, but I really think it is not my English
that is the problem. I think you spend too much time replying, not enough
time reading.

I won't even bother with the "anti-imperialist" alliance with the Islamists
bit. You have time. Read my posts.

very very very patiently yours,
Zeynep



     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---