Discussin' with Galoppin' Gina: "Forgetfulness"

[rolf.martens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rolf Martens)]

Gina,

You wrote, Thu 6 June, to Adolfo, i.a.:


>Now, could you state with  equal clarity just what are the criteria,
>exactly, for determining who is and who is not a "phony" and an
>"enemy of the revolution"?

May I help answering part of that? We've all had a debate, remember,
in which the "Quispe/Ccorimania" entity was completely exposed
as a US imperialist agent and an enemy of the revolution. Yet
you still support that entity and attack its exposers. This clearly
shows you up as one of the phonies. Not so difficult to
understand, really.

One method of yours in the earlier discussions also was
something which, to me, indicated, if not proved, a phoneyness
in you: Your constant walking like the cat around the hot brew
(I'm not certain whether this is a proverbial expression in
English; it is in Swedish, German etc) avoiding the real issues
under discussion - for instance, always refusing to comment
with one word on my Info #3en on the character of the "RIMitz".

Over the weeks, I noticed this getting worse and worse; you so
to speak first just walked around the hot brew, then started
running, breaking into a Trot (NB pun - supposed to remind you
of your close friend and ally Malignki, Sweden!) and eventually into
a Gallop. This when you brought forward that PCP 1988 International
Line statement, vaguely referring to "references to..." instead
of answering the concrete question I had put to you for the
n:th time. Somehow you had "forgotten" that.

It was only then that I came to associate you with a brief
venture of mine into gambling decades ago. I never was
much for such stuff but someone once said he had a rather sure
thing on the so-called V5; the question was just whether to
"guard" (I don't know the exact term) one horse in the 5th
race or not - it was the favourite but sometimes gallopped.
I took the chance, opting for the suggested "32 lines" system
and not the "64 lines" one, which cost me $6 instead of $12
but then made me miss that $200 win my friend actually got,
since of course the one I had as single in 5th this time did
gallop. It happened to be called "Gina". (Sorry!) An unusual name
in Sweden and I otherwise mostly associate it with that Italian
film star I'm old enough to remember. But since that posting of
yours, that alliterative expression I have in my subject line
kept popping up in my head whenever I reflected on the
ideological discussion with you. Now that you've run away
>from the Detcom comrades and over to Quaspie's miserable
reactionary group it seems to fit even better.

Your "question" quoted above seems to imply you've run so fast
that you forgot there ever was any debate or any Ouashpie
exposure. But there was, you know. And I'm writing this not mainly
to remind *you* of that fact but to remind others of one of
the characteristical features of your kind of opportunists:
Their quick-quick-quick "forgetting" of what happened three weeks
ago, one week ago, yesterday. Your friend Australian Avakian clone
"C" (whom I'll get back to) is like that too.

Rolf M.







     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---