Re: centrally planned economy

[Adam Rose <adam@xxxxxxxx>]

> From owner-marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Jun  5 06:07:52 1996
>       id AB25216; Wed, 5 Jun 96 06:07:46 GMT
> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 15:14:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Louis N Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: centrally planned economy
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type> : > TEXT/PLAIN> ; > charset=US-ASCII>
> Sender: owner-marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reply-To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Content-Length: 480
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 1996, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> >
> > It's easier to see it that way if you leave the net's 30-year relation with
> > the Pentagon out of the picture.
> >
>
> Louis: When I give my workshop at the Brecht Forum, I dwell on this at
> some length. This is called a contradiction of a contradiction. Bhaksar
> flowcharted this in some detail, I believe, in the 3rd chapter of
> his "Hermeneutics of Dialectical Phenomenology".
>
>

I can more or less get my head around a negation of a negation, but a 
contradiction
of a contradiction ? My head is spinning faster than Ariane 5 . . .

Adam.





     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---