The "tea" party..

[malecki@xxxxxxxxxx (Robert Malecki)]

knaife@xxxxxxx (Knaife) wrote:

>If a list called M2 is "having a quaint little tea party in cyber-space
>while people are dying", then does that make Malecki a party-crasher, or a
>party-pooper?

>It is sad that he is so upset, but sadder that he is wasting his time
>fighting against the existence of something while he also "defends the
>right" of M2 to have a discussion ??   In the same post?  This is getting
>confusing.

>And what exactly is M2 supposed to apologize for?  Being responsible for
>all capitalist oppression of proletarians everywhere, or for hurting Bob's
>feelings?

>I don't get it.

Hi,

In one letter you are whining about how the maoists tried to destroy the
marxist list. And the next you are talking about a tea party.

Make up your mind will you.

M2 "being resonsible for " trying to gag free speech and bureaucratic moves
under pressure of a few maoist mensheviks.

That is about all you have done. The other stuff is just your fantasi my friend.

And the apoligy. Well, just get M2 to apoligise for what you openly ammitted
in your first letter.

The elegant Baroness and the ivory tower paniced in the face of a few
maoists..After panicing they the M2 started making up the rules as they went
along..

Thirdly they took me and other people off the list without a hearing. Poof
as if they were gods or something.

malecki in exile..

Finally to you personally. By posting your first letter under the title
"Boycott Malecki". In fact what you did was block with the far right and
patriot forces on the net that i am fighting a real war with.

It also means that you quite openly give them ammunition to use against
working class people who are fighting them from exile.

I knew you people in the M2 have no principles on workers democracy. But
openly blocking with the class enemy on the net well..

malecki in exile




     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---