Re: Labor Party -- longshore resolution

To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Labor Party -- longshore resolution
From: Adam Rose <adam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 May 96 10:20:41 GMT

Thanks, Tom for your various posts.

Can you tell me something, Tom ( or Jon , or anyone else ) : Do you have to
be an LPA member to attend the Labor Party Convention ?

Thanks,
Adam.

Adam Rose
SWP
Manchester
UK

---------------------------------------------------------------

--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Prev by Date: Re: Capitalism in Russia
Next by Date: Re: Pessimism of the Intellect, and the Optimism of the Will
Previous by thread: Labor Party -- longshore resolution
Next by thread: LOV: centre/periphery
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Leader from Electronics Weekly - text, Adam Rose Tue 28 May 1996, 15:45 GMT
- MacDonalds/Disney Cooperation, Chris, London Tue 28 May 1996, 15:32 GMT
- LOV: centre/periphery, Chris, London Tue 28 May 1996, 15:31 GMT
- Labor Party -- longshore resolution, Tom Condit Tue 28 May 1996, 15:24 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Labor Party -- longshore resolution, Adam Rose Wed 29 May 1996, 10:20 GMT
- Labor Party -- Inland Boatmen's resolution, Tom Condit Tue 28 May 1996, 15:20 GMT
- Quispe exposes self on LAB again!, Maoist Internationalist Movement Tue 28 May 1996, 15:19 GMT
- Re: Anonymity and the internet (fwd), Spoon Collective Tue 28 May 1996, 14:38 GMT
- Nicaragua, Louis N Proyect Tue 28 May 1996, 13:18 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]