re-rahul

[MimiLazlo@xxxxxxx]

mimi here. well, well, well, what have we here. seems like this is some kinda
private mens club w/ the texas ranger rahul checkin up that no little 16 yr
old pierced girls come to see what the ol fogey macho marxists are mutterin
to themselves. ok rahul baby, just to put yr little u of texas mind at ease,
im not gonna cut off yr dick. i was just joshin you. you and your buddy
buddha can sleep easy. but dont go tellin me that i dont know a heterosexist
remark when i hear one. so lets go thru it one more time for yr benefit.

>
>Dear Mimi,
>
>Sorry the reference went over your head

you little liar. yr not sorry at all. you enjoy talking over womens heads
specially if theyre younger than you. am i right or am i wrong?

>.Hugh's the man for you.

sexism!

>Also, I definitely didn't imply that all women are heterosexual, I merely
      said that most are.

is that a fact? first of all, that's not what you sd. second of all, how  dya
know
that sherrif?

>If you don't need no man, then I'm sure that's very fortunate for you and
for all men.

more heterosexism!

> I know you're probably some 16-year-old whose idea of rebellion is piercing
several parts of your anatomy and talking about how men suck, but that
shouldn't preclude you from saying something substantive.

now why dont you tell me how you *know* that. cmon, sherrif.

>BTW, the last time I had some fun was when I responded to you. Sundays can
be mighty slow down here in Texas.
>
>Rahul

so you take my threat in jest & then get all workt up abt me making threats.
wow. yr really too much. so lets have some more fun. lets talk substance.
whaddya know abt 16 yr old girls? why the o so snide put down of body art?
how dya think girls shld rebel against the system? by sucking up to marxist
men? cmon, lets hear some substance. ciao 4 now, mimi






     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---