Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont
>> HOW "you ... raise the labor party issue in your rail union". It is
fairly clear from David's post that he would not raise it
in quite the same way as the LPA leadership would raise it.
Could I probe for a bit more information ? In what context was
this message originally composed ? <<Adam Rose
Jon Flanders:
It was written specifically for a discussion among rail workers. I will have
to find the time to respond to David Walters questions later.
E-mail from: Jonathan E. Flanders, 16-May-1996
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Maoist serendipity,
Hugh Rodwell Thu 16 May 1996, 20:31 GMT
- EL DIARIO 33: HUAYCAN: REACTIONARIES BREAK RANKS (page 2),
hariette spierings Thu 16 May 1996, 20:29 GMT
- EL DIARIO: ARMED STRUGGLE IN NEPAL INSPIRES ITSELF IN THE PW IN PERU (page 6),
hariette spierings Thu 16 May 1996, 20:09 GMT
- Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont,
Jon Flanders Thu 16 May 1996, 20:01 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont,
Jon Flanders Thu 16 May 1996, 20:01 GMT
- Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont,
Louis N Proyect Thu 16 May 1996, 21:51 GMT
- Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont,
Jon Flanders Fri 17 May 1996, 01:02 GMT
- Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont,
boddhisatva Fri 17 May 1996, 05:12 GMT
- Re: Reply to: Re: Reply to: Re: US Rail Cont,
Adam Rose Fri 17 May 1996, 08:33 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]