Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: Measuring exploitation



At 4:36 PM 5/15/96, Paul Cockshott wrote:>

Carnell
>-------
>How do *you* measure 'exploitation'?
>
>Cockshott
>---------
>It is best done at the level of the economy as a whole.
>I have tended to use national income statistics in my
>work, other authors use input-output tables. The
>authorative account of the methodolgy to be used is
>given in Shaik and Tonak, 'Measuring the Wealth of
>Nations'.
>
>For the US good figures are given by Mosely:
>
>Exploitation in the US over 4 decades, after Moseley

[etc.]

The World Bank publishes a wages as percent of value added in manufacturing
for lots of countries over 20-30 years in its annual World Tables. They are
in a downtrend in most of the countries I've looked at, with the prominent
exception of S Korea. Here are the numbers from World Tables 1994:

UK
1972 51.3
1990 42.0

US
1972 45.3
1990 35.6

Germany
1972 47.7
1990 41.6

Japan
1972 34.8
1990 33.0

Canada
1972 51.6
1990 44.1

Sweden
1972 51.7
1990 34.8

S Korea
1972 23.5
1990 30.5 (!)

Mexico
1972 41.4
1990 20.1

Peru
1972 20.5
1988 13.9



Doug

--

Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
email: <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html>




--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---




Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]