Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Labor Party
>
>
>
>
> Mr. Malecki,
>
>
>
> Since you and I were both on the LPA list, you know that your remark
>about bureaucratic exclusions is incorrect. The majority of contributers
>there rejected the idea of exclusions that both you and I protested.
>
>
>
> On the other hand, I share with you what I believe is your opinion
>that America may be so backwards that such a modest proposal as the LP may be
>revolutionary. If it gets some support, I think the LP may turn out to be a
>bigger and faster-moving thing than its creators ever conceived of.
>
>
Hi Boddi,
Well, we will really have to see what happens. When communists start to put
the programatic screw on then will come the real test about exclusions.I am
not entirely convince that the LP is the only alternative in America or the
fastest growing thing either.
malecki in exile...
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: Labor Party, (continued)
- Re: Labor Party,
Pete Sun 12 May 1996, 19:01 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Walter Daum Mon 13 May 1996, 00:49 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Robert Malecki Mon 13 May 1996, 06:56 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
boddhisatva Mon 13 May 1996, 07:54 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Robert Malecki Mon 13 May 1996, 09:50 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Adam Rose Mon 13 May 1996, 13:35 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Adam Rose Mon 13 May 1996, 14:10 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Hugh Rodwell Mon 13 May 1996, 18:29 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Adam Rose Tue 14 May 1996, 13:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]