Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Labor Party
Mr. Malecki,
Since you and I were both on the LPA list, you know that your remark
about bureaucratic exclusions is incorrect. The majority of contributers
there rejected the idea of exclusions that both you and I protested.
On the other hand, I share with you what I believe is your opinion
that America may be so backwards that such a modest proposal as the LP may be
revolutionary. If it gets some support, I think the LP may turn out to be a
bigger and faster-moving thing than its creators ever conceived of.
peace
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: Labor Party, (continued)
- Re: Labor Party,
MD575151 Sun 12 May 1996, 17:17 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Pete Sun 12 May 1996, 19:01 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Walter Daum Mon 13 May 1996, 00:49 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Robert Malecki Mon 13 May 1996, 06:56 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
boddhisatva Mon 13 May 1996, 07:54 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Robert Malecki Mon 13 May 1996, 09:50 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Adam Rose Mon 13 May 1996, 13:35 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Adam Rose Mon 13 May 1996, 14:10 GMT
- Re: Labor Party,
Hugh Rodwell Mon 13 May 1996, 18:29 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]