"Maoist economics"

["Chris, London" <100423.2040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hugh:
----

He's pissing around the pot a bit, but basically seems to be saying that
voluntarist, non-optimum labour effort thrown at social needs won't solve
the problems of the world proletariat. In which case I agree with him.

Chris:
------

We are in danger of mixing metaphors here. While I welcome looking
for at least some points of agreement I don't think Hugh has grasped
the challenge.

The thrust of Gina's arguments are (not only must all expropriators
be expropriated but) *commodity exchange must be phased out on
a world scale*.






     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---