Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: bombs
Paul Cockshott wrote:
> Jorn:
> Do you really think that a working class could use atomic bombs
> for any good? Nuclear weapons are offensive weapons which mainly
> kill *people* (i.e. workers). How could a workers' state argue
> at the same time as it uses nuclear weapons that those same workers
> should fight their own rulers and not a foreign workers' state?
> I think it's impossible ...
> Paul C
> ------
> If the USSR had not acquired the bomb by the end of the 40s, can
> you doubt that the US would have used nuclear weapons in the Korean
> war?
Jorn:
They probably would - but that doesn't say anything about
what workers could or should do with nuclear arms.
Unless of course you think Stalin's Russia was some kind
of state with workers in control? I don't.
Yours
Jorn Andersen
IS
Denmark
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: A question to Brian,
Brian Carnell Mon 06 May 1996, 04:41 GMT
- Re: Soviet Marxism,
Jorn Andersen Mon 06 May 1996, 01:19 GMT
- Re: bombs,
Jorn Andersen Wed 10 Jan 1996, 01:17 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- bombs,
Paul Cockshott Thu 09 May 1996, 21:09 GMT
- Re: bombs,
boddhisatva Fri 10 May 1996, 03:33 GMT
- Re: bombs,
Robert Malecki Fri 10 May 1996, 04:38 GMT
- Re: bombs,
Robert Malecki Fri 10 May 1996, 04:38 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]