Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
The workers' bomb?
Robert Malecki wrote:
> I do not think the the miracle of technology the atomic bomb
> is very revolutionary or pro-working class. But better in the
> hands of the workers then the capitalists...
Jorn:
> Yes, but for one reason only: The workers could destroy it.
> The workers could never use it for any good.
Robert:
> I think the above is wishful thinking. Do you really think that the working
> class would one sidely dismantle atomic bombs while imperialism is armed to
> the teeth?
> I don,t..
Jorn:
Do you really think that a working class could use atomic bombs
for any good? Nuclear weapons are offensive weapons which mainly
kill *people* (i.e. workers). How could a workers' state argue
at the same time as it uses nuclear weapons that those same workers
should fight their own rulers and not a foreign workers' state?
I think it's impossible ...
Yours
Jorn Andersen
IS
Denmark
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: bombs, (continued)
- Re: bombs,
Robert Malecki Fri 10 May 1996, 04:38 GMT
- bombs,
Paul Cockshott Fri 10 May 1996, 12:41 GMT
- Re: Socialist advances in Italy!!!,
Jorn Andersen Wed 10 Jan 1996, 00:59 GMT
- The workers' bomb?,
Jorn Andersen Tue 09 Jan 1996, 15:11 GMT
- Re: Rolf M. in bed with imperialism...,
Jorn Andersen Tue 09 Jan 1996, 01:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]