Re: Last Message of the ZodiaC(OP)

[hariette@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (hariette spierings)]

AS AN MATTER OF SIMPLE FACT:


>I wrote this letter this morning, worried you'd think he was talking about
>me. But then I didn't send it, thinking you'd be reasonable.
>
>Please reread what he wrote. I don't think he was talking about me, but the
>American Reporter fellow. You have released our private email.
>
>Ken.
>
>~~~~~~~~
>
>Hi L&M --
>
>I am not going to get involved with this debate. I wrote a two-part series
>in a tone suitable to the publication at hand. I tried to remove a great
>deal of bullshit around the story by going directly to the sources (PCP
>documents, and the people actually on the net talking about the issue) and
>helping those with an interest in this subject to educate themselves in a
>similarly direct fashion, thereby circumventing the mainstream press.
>
>I did not include the animosity between yourselves and Adolfo, because that
>would simply have made more complex an already extremely complex story.
>
>Anyway, I'm mainly writing to clarify something here... I'm not positive
>what AO is talking about in the below quote, I think it's about the American
>Reporter article (which he then reprints):
>
>>A curious fact is that when that article was published, the egregious and
>>"self-effacing" Mr. Quispe actually wrote a mailer to the "journalist"
>>offering himself as an interlocutor "to give the real information about the
>>People's War in Peru".  God makes them and they come together of their own
>>accord.
>>
>>It would be helpful for those who have access to good research facilities to
>>give as an illuminating run down on the "Pinkerton people".
>
>Just wanted to make it clear: I have never said you approached me, I
>approached you.
>
>Lastly, the copy Malecki uploaded is just an excerpt. Here's the full story,
>as permanently archived online.
>
>Ken.
>



As a matter of clarifying an issue of fact , Ken is absolutely right in
saying that what I referred to was Mr. Quispe writing to the journalist of
the American Reporter and not in any way to him, Ken Campbell.  No one with
a bit of common sense could have the slightests doubt about that since, as
Ken points out, the copy of the offending "journalistic piece" by the
Pinkerton agency electronic magazine is the only issue being discussed in my
mailer and it is actually reprinted there as an attached file.

To create confussion of the issues, make wild allegations, calling everyone
who criticises them in the slighttest a "traitor" - and to blow gigantic
smoke-screens - are well know phenomena in those delirious moments in the
process of denial in the dying, and is the hallmark of those entering final
agony.




     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---