Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?
In-Reply-To: <199604142118.WAA23664@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
A maoist lied as follows :
>Here in England there is an old saying among the working people: Blues
>(Tories) are good but hypocritical shafters (fuckers), the reds
(communists)
>are good and discreet ones too, but those bloody pinkos (labourites,
social
>democrat and "leftists" like Carlos, McLleland, and Mcleeme) are as lousy
>lays as they are big talkers!
Let me hasten to assure the international readeship of this list that
there is no such saying among the working people (or any other) of
England.
There ought to be one runs "Those that tell porkies in minor matters can
reliably be expected to do the same on major matters."
_________________________________
jplant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?, (continued)
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?,
Ryan Sun 14 Apr 1996, 17:35 GMT
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?,
Charlotte Kates Sun 14 Apr 1996, 19:37 GMT
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?,
hariette spierings Sun 14 Apr 1996, 21:18 GMT
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?,
Jorn Andersen Mon 15 Apr 1996, 03:38 GMT
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?,
Jj Plant Mon 15 Apr 1996, 20:40 GMT
- Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?,
hariette spierings Mon 15 Apr 1996, 22:45 GMT
- Re: Sex--a revolutionary view Part I,
Rubyg580 Sat 13 Apr 1996, 20:22 GMT
- Re:boddhisatva on capital,
Rubyg580 Sat 13 Apr 1996, 20:22 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]