Re: MAL: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?

[hariette@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (hariette spierings)]

>In a message dated 96-04-13 12:32:14 EDT, you write:
>
>>From: Robert Malecki <malecki@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>Subject: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?
>
>>>Another proletarian opinion:
>>>If I can't fuck, you can keep your revolution!
>>>
>>>                             -- Jeff Booth
>
>>That is very true and very funny!
>
>Talk about totally self-serving, bourgeois mentality.  Asserting the
>right to "fuck", with no mention of any regard for the other person
>who necessarily has to be involved in a "fuck".  Sorry, guys, there's
>nothing proletarian about this shit, and for the victims and potential
>victims of your "right to fuck" mentality, nothing funny either.
>
>Gina/ Detroit
>


Very pertinent Gina's comments.  Evidently the "pimp mentality" and the
"right to sexually exploit" advocates who have taken with their "jolly old
boys comments" to the list on this issue, have nothing in common with
proletarian outlook, rather, theirs is the "mercenary soldier" of
imperialism credo.  Why take part in a war if you cannot loot and rape to
your hearts content.  That is the meaning of their "struggle for survival".
You ask any soldier of fortune, and he will roll out the same bloody
excuses:  "struggle for survival"!

It is all now coming out in the washing!  Sexual imperialism and sexual
fascism, masquerading as "liberation"!.

Adolfo Olaechea




     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---