Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Totality vs. Totalitarianism
>
> When we approach the study of any totality, we need to have a
>little humility here... something that even Marx and Engels occasionally
>lack. We are ALWAYS internal to the context that we criticize; our
>criticism is ALWAYS immanent to that totality. And any efforts to rise
>above that totality to judge it from the outside, as if we were God-like,
>synoptic creatures, is not only futile, but dangerous.
When viewed undialectically
>and as a purely deterministic formula, Marx's historical materialism is a
>mechanistic application that must be avoided.
>
What Marx teaches however, that is of great importance, is that
>we can understand the totality by grasping it NOT from a synoptic vantage
>point, but from many different vantage points within the totality, thus
>helping ourselves in the construction of a richer, more complex portrait
>of the interrelationships within that totality.
> I've gone on long enough...
> - Chris
>==================================================
>Dr. Chris M. Sciabarra
>Visiting Scholar, NYU Department of Politics
>INTERNET: sciabrrc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>http://pages.nyu.edu/~sciabrrc
>==================================================
Yeah, you are actually very right!
I mean also that you have already gone too long, Professor. It is time to
synthesise!
Adolfo Olaechea
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Ken,s letter, Louis and me...,
Robert Malecki Sat 13 Apr 1996, 16:26 GMT
- Totality vs. Totalitarianism,
Chris M. Sciabarra Sat 13 Apr 1996, 15:59 GMT
- Re: Reply to Rahul Mahajan's...Intellectuals and Populace,
Carrol Cox Sat 13 Apr 1996, 15:14 GMT
- Doug's comment on totalitarianism,
zodiac Sat 13 Apr 1996, 14:12 GMT
- He*lp please: Negation of the Negation,
Chris, London Sat 13 Apr 1996, 07:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]