Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?

To: marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?
From: Robert Malecki <malecki@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 1996 07:55:36 +0200 (MET DST)

>
>Another proletarian opinion:
>If I can't fuck, you can keep your revolution!
>
> -- Jeff Booth
>
That is very true and very funny!

--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

Prev by Date: Re: Sex and the Vietcong
Next by Date: New list purposal vs workers
Previous by thread: Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?
Next by thread: Re: Freemen and Israel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- Re: Freemen and Israel, (continued)
  - Re: Freemen and Israel, Mike Lynch Sun 14 Apr 1996, 09:19 GMT
- Sex: What do communists stand for?, Robert Malecki Fri 12 Apr 1996, 15:48 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?, hariette spierings Fri 12 Apr 1996, 17:24 GMT
  - Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?, Jeffrey Booth Fri 12 Apr 1996, 20:39 GMT
  - Re: Sex: What do communists stand for?, Robert Malecki Sat 13 Apr 1996, 05:55 GMT
- Reply to: Re: HEROIC PARTY VS. DECADENT, Jon Flanders Fri 12 Apr 1996, 14:30 GMT
- What the list should discuss, Louis N Proyect Fri 12 Apr 1996, 12:40 GMT
  - <Possible follow-up(s)>
  - Re: What the list should discuss, Jorn Andersen Fri 12 Apr 1996, 15:23 GMT
- Re: Luftmensch: pigs in peru, Rubyg580 Fri 12 Apr 1996, 10:53 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]