Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: beef
At 8:08 AM 4/11/96, Robert Malecki wrote:
>>This probably isn't the right place to ask the question, but I wonder what
>>the cost of beef would be were its social and environmental costs fully
>>reflected in its price.
>>
>>Doug
>>
>Hi,
>
>For some reason i am getting the feeling that the tone of this debate
>including the above is sort like people who have experienced everything and
>are now deciding for the masses under the cover of "marxist" (?) debate what
>is good for them and what is not.
A lot of bourgeois economics is crap, but the concept of externalities -
effects on third parties not reflected in market prices - is a useful one
(and one, properly considered, that's very damaging to bourgeois
economics). If some people raise and eat beef and cause immense damage to
non-raisers and non-eaters, the question is entirely relevant.
Doug
--
Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
email: <dhenwood@xxxxxxxxx>
web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html>
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: beef, (continued)
- Re: beef,
Jorn Andersen Thu 11 Apr 1996, 04:38 GMT
- Re: beef,
Robert Malecki Thu 11 Apr 1996, 06:08 GMT
- Re: beef,
Rahul Mahajan Thu 11 Apr 1996, 07:06 GMT
- Re: beef,
boddhisatva Thu 11 Apr 1996, 07:51 GMT
- Re: beef,
Doug Henwood Thu 11 Apr 1996, 12:54 GMT
- Re: beef,
Louis N Proyect Thu 11 Apr 1996, 14:09 GMT
- Re: beef,
Doug Henwood Thu 11 Apr 1996, 18:03 GMT
- Re: beef,
boddhisatva Fri 12 Apr 1996, 04:13 GMT
- clarifications,
Doug Henwood Thu 11 Apr 1996, 00:43 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]