Re: Gina,s strategic world veiw?

[detcom@xxxxxxxxxxx]

On Fri, 5 Apr 1996, malecki@xxxxxxxxxx (Robert Malecki) wrote:

>By the way Gina you and Aldolfo are extremely quiet on Vietnam. You mention
>a whole number of things above but not Vietnam. What is your position on
>this question?
>
>     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
Robert:
You haven't asked my opinion but I give it anyway, The United
States got it's fucking ass kicked royally by the heroic
people of Vietnam.  It was such a thrilliing happy moment
seeing on TV the dirty US troops scrambling like rats to get
on helecopters to escape justice of the masses.  People all
over the planet celebrated the great defeat of US imperialism.

If you really examine what these people that deny a victory for
the people are saying, what comes forth is the message that
people should not fight against their oppressors, don't make
waves, kiss the slavemasters ass.  Cause it will go bad for you
if you resist.  And whose viewpoint that is, whose message that
is, is the oppressor class, the slavemasters, the bourgeoisie.
These same kind of folk try to put forward revisionist history
not just in this issue, but they tear down and villify all the
efforts of the masses to defeat their enemies.  This is why
mummies like Doug laugh at capitalism being restored in China,
because they actually have a stake in this imperialist system,
their interests lie in preserving and protecting this shit.



     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---