Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Red Referendum (PROYECT'S REVISIONISM)
> The point is that only by subordinating its immediate interests - economic
> and "bourgeois political" (i.e.reformist) - can the proletariat take care of
> its real (long term) interests. Subordinating does not mean giving them up
> or abandoning them in any way, just looking at the grander picture of the
> interests of the class as a whole and acting SELFLESSLY to overthrow all
> oppressive social conditions as they arise.
I agree with you that selflessness is very nice. My mother was so selfless,
and we admired her so much, even though we were not always grateful enough
for it, especially my sister. But I wonder, if everyone was selfless,
then nobody would have any fun. Do you think that's true? Why do selfless
people do it. Don't they do it so others can have fun? Although I have
to say that my sister and me didn't have very much fun. My sister says
it was my mother who was having fun being selfless. What do you think?
Veronica
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
- Thread context:
- Re: Lenin: immediate socialist revolution is IMPOSSIBLE, (continued)
- What was the "red referendum"?,
Louis N Proyect Thu 04 Apr 1996, 12:48 GMT
- Re: Project's Re-posting,
Louis N Proyect Thu 04 Apr 1996, 12:45 GMT
- Re: Red Referendum (PROYECT'S REVISIONISM),
hariette spierings Thu 04 Apr 1996, 11:39 GMT
- Shanghai 1927, Indonesia 1965,
Louis N Proyect Thu 04 Apr 1996, 11:15 GMT
- Project's Re-posting of Ken's jewel and old Peking Review Article Again,
detcom Thu 04 Apr 1996, 10:35 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]