Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: A socialist Alliance



You(Richard) wrote:>

>Hello - I join this list about a month ago and I have just finished
reading
>the back log of postings and one thing that striked me was the petty
>squabbling.

Carlos Asks:

What do you call "petty squabbling"? The discussions on Market
Socialism vs. state=centered economy?, the thread disputing claims
from the rump bunch of murderers of Leftists, Snining Path? The
discussions now beginning about LPA? The exchange about
subjectivity or Spinoza? What exactly are you talking about?

Richard:
>
>I know people are members of different left parties/orgainasions and
they
>have to say that"our parties are better than yours", but I think it is
time
>to put more positive ideas of uniformity forward.

Carlos:

Who exactly are you talking about? Your own comrades? The
Stalinists United Counter-revolutionary -reformist front of
Godenas-Quispe-Scott Marshall-CKates and Matt "Dillon"? the
omnes of the kind of "Chris London" who in their effort to
stand in the middle always he hit twice? Or a number of
Trotskyists, anarchists, Troskyists-Castroites and son on
who disagree on many things but stand together in a couple
principples issues?

In other words, we see tendencies, alliances which are cosntructed
and then dissappear, everyone against everyone, then blocks, very
lively List, indeed.... Don't mess around with our fun!

Richard:
>
>I am a member of the British section of the Committee for a Workers
>International (Militant Labour) and as we all know my party is better
than
>yours - but seriously, in Militant Labour in Britain we have put the
idea
>of Socialist Alliances into practice, meetings up and down the country
have
>taken place.
>
Carlos:

This stuff is interesting, Richard. But I have a question for you.

I counted the number of participants in the meetings you mentioned
and they are less that 1,000. Militant have two three times that
number, isn't? Then, only one third of the organization
participated and, moreover .... if only 1,000 participated in these
meetings, how many were from other tendencies and how many from
Militant? )
>
Richard:
>The enemy is the World capitalists............
>

Carlos:

Sure, Richard, but isn't Stalinism and Socialdemocracy "agents of
the world capitalism inside the working class"? Isn't fighting the
Stalinists (like Shining Path, CPUSA and others) part of that
struggle against reformism and, therefore, against the agents of
capitalism inside the working class?

Comradely,
Carlos



> ///
> (oo)
> O
> ( __ )
> --00---------------00--
> All the best from Richard
> -------------------------
>HOME PAGE http://www.rpms.ac.uk/csc/photo/photoatsg1.html
>PERSONAL PAGE http://www.rpms.ac.uk/csc/photo/photoatsg13.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>



--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

------------------



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]