Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Negri's Marxism. "Work" vs "Labor" in English.
- Subject: Re: Negri's Marxism. "Work" vs "Labor" in English.
- From: cbcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Carrol Cox)
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 22:30:25 -0600 (CST)
It think both Marx and Engels (though I forget in which work) mark
the general fact that in English the Germanic word (work) refers to
the concrete activity while the Latin word (labor) refers to the
social abstraction.
So it is possible to express a distinction in extra-verbal reality
in English (that between the activity of work, the social category of
labor) that other languages tend to collapse. Arendt, borrowing from
Marx, makes a big deal of a tripple distinction: action, work, labor. She
also, however, treats "labor" as belonging to the realm of necessity, that
which is always to be avoided so far as possible, in contrast to work and
action which belong in the realm of freedom. (It's been forty years since
I read Arendt, so this is probably not quite accurate.)
Carrol Cox
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- PERU: Mobile PCP Guerrilla Rescued POWs.,
Luis Quispe Mon 19 Feb 1996, 05:32 GMT
- PERU: Report on the Civil War (II),
Luis Quispe Mon 19 Feb 1996, 05:29 GMT
- PERU: Report on the Civil War (I),
Luis Quispe Mon 19 Feb 1996, 05:27 GMT
- Re: two concepts of dictatorship of the proletariat. ?,
Carrol Cox Mon 19 Feb 1996, 04:45 GMT
- Re: Negri's Marxism. "Work" vs "Labor" in English.,
Carrol Cox Mon 19 Feb 1996, 04:30 GMT
- Re: two concepts of dictatorship of the proletariat,
Bruce Buchan Mon 19 Feb 1996, 04:23 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]