Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Materialism
- Subject: Re: Materialism
- From: J Laari <jlaari@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 1996 18:02:48 +0200 (EET)
Justin,
surely Feuerbach was important. But in that context [Spinoza, Hegel,
Marx & Althusser+Negri+Macherey+Deleuze on Spinoza/Hegel-Marx
relationship] I think I don't have to be ashamed of what I wrote?
Otherwise I agree. By the way: what about Marx's dissertation? I don't
know much about that.
Yours, Jukka L
> This attribution of Marx's materialism to Spinoza is certianly erroneous.
> Marx's materialism comes from Feuerbach. He did read a bit of Spinoza in
> his earlier years, but his allusions to S are always rather general.
> Insofar as S is ant sort of real inflouence on M's thought, it must be
> through S's influence on Hegel. In this regard S is to Marx the way
> Rousseau (actually in my view a more important influence) is, something
> gleaned through and filtered by Hegel.
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: SWP, (continued)
- Re: SWP,
Ralph Dumain Sun 18 Feb 1996, 05:52 GMT
- Not under the table this time,
J Laari Sat 17 Feb 1996, 16:30 GMT
- the State of the List,
Doug Henwood Sat 17 Feb 1996, 15:58 GMT
- Materialism,
Justin Schwartz Sat 17 Feb 1996, 15:39 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Materialism,
J Laari Sat 17 Feb 1996, 16:02 GMT
- Re: Materialism,
Ralph Dumain Sat 17 Feb 1996, 19:48 GMT
- Re: Materialism,
HANS DESPAIN Sat 17 Feb 1996, 19:52 GMT
- Re: Materialism,
Justin Schwartz Sat 17 Feb 1996, 20:08 GMT
- Re: Materialism,
glevy Sat 17 Feb 1996, 21:49 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]