Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Censorship and evasions
Louis P., in typical form, has evaded the issues I raised in my post
which primarily concerned: a) whether it is appropriate for us to
threaten a person by appealing to their Net provider to censor their
posts; and b) whether it is appropriate for "moderators" to partake in such
threats.
Since Louis has evaded dealing with the issues _yet again_, I will
included excerpts from my previous post.
Jerry
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Subject: Re: Threats and warnings
On 17 Feb 1996, Chris, London wrote:
> Threats and warnings are part of the range of normal argument.
> They risk escalating the conflict but they may sometimes be necessary.
<snip>
> Kevin's remarks, below, however, have the merit of being brief,
> and clear. While I would not myself formally
> propose such an action on this uncensored l*st, IMO
> Kevin's point is one of many, in which
> subscribers have sought to make clear to Elsequin, his
> approach is unacceptable.
> I hope Elsequin will see it to his (?) advantage to understand their
> point of view.
> Chris
> London, Co-moderator
> _____________________________________________________________
> Elsequin, please put your flames elsewhere. You've yet to say
> anything intelligent amidst all your babble, and if you don't quit I'll be
> sure to send your postmaster a message to stop you from sending e-mail to
> Scott, the CPUSA, or the Mar*ism Li*t.
> Kevin
So Chris, identifying himself as co-moderator in this post, *is* in favor
of censorship. *He* doesn't want to censor Elsequin's posts, but he
supports a threat to ask *others* (i.e. Elsequin's Net system) to censor
his posts.
IMHO, Kevin's post, although it didn't include scatalogical references,
was more ominous than anything that Elsequin wrote. I gather that Kevin
is, or should be, supportive of government and/or provider action to censor
Net posts. Based on the above, I gather that Chris, as well, is in favor of
government and/or provider censorship. <snip>
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Reform and revolution,
glevy Sat 17 Feb 1996, 15:07 GMT
- Amnesty International,
LeoCasey Sat 17 Feb 1996, 14:59 GMT
- Censorship and evasions,
glevy Sat 17 Feb 1996, 14:56 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Censorship and evasions,
Chris, London Sat 17 Feb 1996, 20:19 GMT
- Re: Censorship and evasions,
glevy Sat 17 Feb 1996, 22:01 GMT
- Re: Censorship and evasions,
CEP Sat 17 Feb 1996, 22:50 GMT
- Re: Censorship and evasions,
Chris, London Sun 18 Feb 1996, 00:39 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]