Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Patents in market socialism
I asked Dave Schweickart about this. He said he'd be inclined to treat
patents as commodities rather than assets, i.e., to vest their ownership
with the patent holders, for a limited time of course. He says he's not
doctrinal about this and would support whatever rule would create
incentives for innovation without compromising social ownership of assets.
--jks
On Thu, 1 Feb 1996, Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
> I still haven't thought this through. But if there are patents in MS, why
> is that a problem? Note by the way that a parent in the S-model will
> probably assign income and use rights to the inventor, but not absolute
> ownership. If we are talking about a productive asset, it will belong to
> the state and the patent user will have tp pay an assets tax on its value.
> And will be responsible for maintaining its value, too!
>
> --Justin
>
> On Sun, 28 Jan 1996 HANLY@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > One key incentive to encourage innovation under capitalism is extensive
> > patent protection. If entrepreneurs either as individual corporations or
> > worker owned industries are to be encouraged to invest large sums in
> > new products the argument is that they need protection from competition
> > from those wh can snatch the info without the costs. THence patents are
> > granted and this creates
> > dynamic efficiency if I remember the catechism correctly- as contrasted
> > with static efficiency. Defenders of market socialism claim that the market
> > as
> > contrasted with command, planned, systems encourages entrepreneurs and thus
> > new
> > ideas and products. So are we to have patents in the brave new market
> > socialist
> > world? After all, it is patents that protect the entrepreneur.
> > Cheers, Ken Hanly
> >
> >
> >
> > --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
>
>
>
>
> --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Bruce Buchan,
Bruce Buchan Mon 05 Feb 1996, 21:51 GMT
- Re: Colin Powell as Bonapartist,
Bruce Buchan Mon 05 Feb 1996, 21:51 GMT
- Re: Khmer Rouge? Huh?,
Justin Schwartz Mon 05 Feb 1996, 21:07 GMT
- Re: re-market socialism,
Paul Cockshott Mon 05 Feb 1996, 20:52 GMT
- Re: Patents in market socialism,
Justin Schwartz Mon 05 Feb 1996, 20:45 GMT
- Re: Re market socialism,
Paul Cockshott Mon 05 Feb 1996, 20:17 GMT
- Re: commodity fetishism and markets,
Paul Cockshott Mon 05 Feb 1996, 20:16 GMT
- Re: marxism and its need of a' theory of subjectivity'-Questions for Pablo,
CEP Mon 05 Feb 1996, 20:08 GMT
- Matt D. embraces Hillary-ism.,
Matt D. Mon 05 Feb 1996, 18:54 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]