Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Khmer Rouge? Huh?
- Subject: Khmer Rouge? Huh?
- From: "Matt D." <afn02065@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 12:03:31 -0500
Justin wrote:
>And of course with the Senderistas one has to wonder about the justice of
>their cause. Their conduct of the war and their ideology suggest that they
>are Latin America's answer ti the Khmer Rouge.
Bracketing, for the moment, what general conclusions we should reach from
our study of the Cambodian/Kampuchean experience, what _specifically_
about the PCP's "conduct of the war and their ideology" suggests to you that
"they are Latin America's answer to the Khmer Rouge"?
Devoid of any explication, this is a statement w/out meaning. Or rather, it
is a
statement the meaning of which is exhausted by its political function, which is
to join the bourgeoisie in its condemnation of revolutionary violence.
Presumably your goal is not to be a cheerleader of reaction, so please offer
some details that we can engage with here.
-- Matt D.
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- WORKING CLASS SUBJECTIVITY, RICHARD WRIGHT, CLR JAMES,
Ralph Dumain Mon 05 Feb 1996, 17:22 GMT
- "Labor chits",
Matt D. Mon 05 Feb 1996, 17:16 GMT
- Khmer Rouge? Huh?,
Matt D. Mon 05 Feb 1996, 17:03 GMT
- Against superstition (Dawkins-Labour Left Briefing)-fwd-,
Lisa Rogers Mon 05 Feb 1996, 15:41 GMT
- Borders and immigration,
Scott Marshall Mon 05 Feb 1996, 15:30 GMT
- Re: Cleveland Browns,
Scott Marshall Mon 05 Feb 1996, 15:30 GMT
- Re: Alperovitz/Gates,
Scott Marshall Mon 05 Feb 1996, 15:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]