Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?
- Subject: Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?
- From: "Bryan A. Alexander" <bnalexan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 11:24:24 -0500 (EST)
There's a crucial point here, and one that our seminar has brought to the
fore: fascism is a strategic and systemic response to a capitalist crisis
(specifically, a combination of financial upsets and proletarian
challenges with significant strength). Our current candidates -
Buchanan, the militias, Farrakhan - are all at best incipient fascists.
Bryan Alexander Department of English
email: bnalexan@xxxxxxxxx University of Michigan
phone: (313) 764-0418 Ann Arbor, MI USA 48103
fax: (313) 763-3128 http://www.umich.edu/~bnalexan
On Mon, 29 Jan 1996, Louis N Proyect wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 1996 ROSSERJB@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > Sorry to be so Americo-centric, but I am wondering
> > what people out there think about the politics of Patrick
> > Buchanan? Is he a fascist, a crypto-fascist, or what?
>
> Louis: No, he is an ordinary garden-variety ultrarightist. Fascism is
> only a meaningful category when capitalism is in deep crisis and requires
> a violent mass-movement of the petty-bourgeoisie to defend itself.
>
> Joe McCarthy was not a fascist either. In a week or two, I am going to
> report on some fascinating discussions that took place in American
> Trotskyism in the early 1950's that attempted to come to grips with this
> question. They reached a mistaken conclusion that McCarthy was a fascist
> because they weren't able to see American politics in a framework
> different from the 1920s and 1930s.
>
> We must not make the same mistake. We are not living in a period of
> capitalist crisis. The period we are in has much more of an analogy to
> the gilded age of the late 1800s. The 1950s and 1960s were an exceptional
> time for the working-class. They enjoyed upward mobility.
>
> That period is no longer with us. We are living in a period of rising
> class tensions. That has led some radicals to view things
> apocalyptically. They view the militias and Louis Farrakhan through the
> prism of Mussolini and Hitler. This is a mistake.
>
> This does not mean that major apocalyptic battles are not coming at some
> future time. They will. But we will screw up if we don't know what time
> it is on the class-struggle clock.
>
>
> --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?, (continued)
- Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?,
Adam Rose Mon 29 Jan 1996, 08:19 GMT
- Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?,
boddhisatva Mon 29 Jan 1996, 08:40 GMT
- Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?,
Louis N Proyect Mon 29 Jan 1996, 14:51 GMT
- Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?,
Kevin Cabral Mon 29 Jan 1996, 21:39 GMT
- Re: Is Patrick Buchanan a fascist?,
Bryan A. Alexander Wed 31 Jan 1996, 16:24 GMT
- Re: DPRK and Louis Godena, Kevin Cabral, Charlotte Kates and Jerry,
boddhisatva Mon 29 Jan 1996, 06:12 GMT
- Re: What I like about antiMS types,
g . maclennan Mon 29 Jan 1996, 06:06 GMT
- Re: Croatia and Slovenia,
ROSSERJB Mon 29 Jan 1996, 05:55 GMT
- The New Flag?,
glevy Mon 29 Jan 1996, 02:15 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]