Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: Query for Anti-Market Socialists
- Subject: Re: Query for Anti-Market Socialists
- From: Adam Rose <adam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 96 08:12:41 GMT
>
> How come Schweickartian proposals for market socialism can
> be dismissed as "abstract modelling", and "utopian", and the
> like, but proposals for planning all production on the basis
> of a smoothly coordinated hierarchy of democratic workers and
> consumers councils stretching across all nations can't be.
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about this. Is it just a case of calling
> names what you don't like for other reasons/prejudices?
>
NO !
Marx's statement along the lines of "the working class cannot simply
lay hands on the existing state" but needs to smash it and replace it
with its own came AFTER the Paris commune.
Lenin, Trotsky and others drew the theoretical consequences of the
Soviet AFTER 1905.
We have seen the embryo of similar organisations repeatedly since then -
Chile and the cordones, Iran and the Shoras, Solidarnosc in 1980-81.
Adam.
Adam Rose
SWP
Manchester
UK
---------------------------------------------------------------
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Marxist analysis of the PRC, (continued)
- Re: Engels on human evolution,
Adam Rose Mon 29 Jan 1996, 09:22 GMT
- Re: Query for Anti-Market Socialists,
Adam Rose Mon 29 Jan 1996, 08:12 GMT
- Re: axes, lawn-mowers, whatever,
Adam Rose Mon 29 Jan 1996, 07:59 GMT
- Italian coops,
ROSSERJB Mon 29 Jan 1996, 07:49 GMT
- Mike, thanks for your statement,
Chris, London Mon 29 Jan 1996, 07:41 GMT
- Stalinist Terror: New Pespectives,
Chris, London Mon 29 Jan 1996, 07:41 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]