Re: the state as capital : was arms production + Dept III

["Bryan A. Alexander" <bnalexan@xxxxxxxxx>]

I assume the "yes" refers to the second, not the first, question?  If so
- and I hope so - please characterize the difference in relations.



Bryan Alexander
Department of English
University of Michigan
**********************

On Thu, 18 Jan 1996, Paul Cockshott wrote:

> Adam
> ----
> state as a capitalist : are you saying then that the large number of
> people employed by states are not exploited ? That somehow they
> are oppressed by different relations of production than those
> which apply in the private sector ?
>
> Paul
> ----
> If employed directly by the state, rather than by a company that
> the state happens to own, then yes.
>
>
>      --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
>


     --- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---

     ------------------