Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: goods without use-value???
- Subject: Re: goods without use-value???
- From: Chegitz Guevara <mluziett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 1996 09:00:31 -0600 (CST)
On Sun, 14 Jan 1996, Lisa Rogers wrote:
> From: glevy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [snip]
> Labor can produce *goods* which do not have a use-value (although,
> this is not the norm in any mode of production). Some labor also
> does not engage in the *production* of goods or commodities.
>
> Lisa: goods without use-value??? Please give me examples.
How about pet rocks?
Marc, "the Chegitz," Luzietti
personal homepage: http://shrike.depaul.edu/~mluziett
political homepage: http://shrike.depaul.edu/~mluziett/chegitz.html
"I just saved your fucking life Mom," YT said, "the least you could is to
offer me an Oreo."
Neal Stephenson's, "Snow Crash."
--- from list marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
------------------
- Thread context:
- Re: Akiba stands!,
Iwao Kitamura Mon 15 Jan 1996, 04:45 GMT
- Justin's sins,
Lisa Rogers Mon 15 Jan 1996, 04:43 GMT
- reply to Mike on Gould and evolution,
Lisa Rogers Mon 15 Jan 1996, 04:12 GMT
- goods without use-value???,
Lisa Rogers Mon 15 Jan 1996, 03:20 GMT
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: goods without use-value???,
Chegitz Guevara Tue 16 Jan 1996, 15:00 GMT
- Re: goods without use-value???,
Christopher Gunn Tue 16 Jan 1996, 17:16 GMT
- Re: goods without use-value???,
glevy Tue 16 Jan 1996, 18:16 GMT
- Re: goods without use-value???,
Justin Schwartz Tue 16 Jan 1996, 20:31 GMT
- Goods without use-value???,
Chris, London Wed 17 Jan 1996, 07:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]